Through the Partnership we established that, on the one hand, there exists a great diversity of volunteering initiatives/projects/interventions that address different societal needs, but on the other hand we also encounter the following problems:
-
Volunteering is at times perceived (and also in some countries the case in reality) to be an activity for the privileged – e.g. white, middle/upper class, academics, well-educated, can afford the time to volunteer;
-
Volunteering is linked to an old-fashioned stereotype of “do-gooding”, which also includes gender-based stereotyping (and reality): women involved in “doing charity” (with the negative connotations this brings), men involved in sports-based or rescue/emergency or leadership (e.g. sitting on organisations’ Boards) volunteering;
-
There still exist many barriers to volunteering. Some of them result from bureaucratic and legal obstacles, such as the amount of hours a person can volunteer while unemployed, so as not to lose benefits. At the same time, some barriers are more institutionalised: intrinsic to the volunteer involving organisations themselves. For example, traditional-type volunteer involving organisations, including those organisations that have been around for a long time, are less willing and/or prepared to modernise and professionalise their volunteer management, volunteer engagement, volunteer recruitment, etc. There is also the issue of volunteers picking up activities “left over” from paid staff – “filling the gaps” – the ethical problem of misusing the commitment and energy of volunteers.
In the light of the fact that volunteer involving organisations are the closest to volunteers, they have the responsibility to professionalise and modernise volunteer management and the way they engage, and reward, volunteers. The Partnership therefore recommends that it is necessary to empower organisers of volunteering to improve the quality and recognition of voluntary activities. For example, the P.A.V.E.[1] document, developed by volunteering practitioners from across the EU during EYV 2011, recommends:
-
The introduction of quality principles, volunteer agreements, monitoring systems and mechanisms to ensure that volunteers are more involved and have influence on the management and decision-making in volunteer involving organisations;
-
The promotion and support of recognition, training and development of volunteers.
-
The Partnership signs up to these recommendations, stressing the need for volunteer empowerment and recognising a very important issue: while volunteering is time given by individuals for free, a meaningful, structured and well-managed volunteering activity does not come cost-free! This means that also funding bodies need to recognise the fact that, in order to achieve the best possible results from a volunteering intervention, some investment has to be also made in the actual capacity of an organisation that manages the volunteering activity. This includes the need to invest in crucial